Harmful Effects of Media Use on Children and
Adolescents
Since the introduction of radio and television, our modern lives
have embraced the prosperity of media use with television shows, video games,
movies, and music. They have become essential parts of our lives. Although many
people believe that media provides us with all the good things, another great
part consider media is the source of problems. Media use is potentially harmful
because of its dangerous influences on children and adolescents like violence
and aggression, sexual matters and health problems.
From the beginning of media use – radio and television
broadcasting – David Sarnoff, President of The Radio Corporation of America,
New York glamorized the potential effects of television which could offer
human-beings distant eyesight. People would be able to extend their visions in
far-away lands that they couldn’t visit; therefore, they would see and widen
their knowledge quickly. Television, combined with radio invention, empowered
humankind in exchanging his voice and image to others all over the world. The
enchanting of radio had brought incredible aural effects from music,
story-telling, instant-news to everyone; yet the strength of visibility helped
enhance emotions of drama, live news, and on-going sporting events.
Radio-television lifted people to cultural development with good music,
dancing, painting, and drama. Politicians would also have effective means to
send their messages to citizens with their active motions and persuading data
from charts. Marine and airplane had better night-views alongside clear
instructors’ voices. Radios and televisions brought up the need of freedom
to discuss and to be treated fairly for everyone. Thanks to these first media
inventions, students could have interesting sound-motion lessons in their
classes. Until now, some other benefits of media use have been proved, such
as: fostering knowledge, connectedness, and health information. As pediatricians, Strasburger,
M.D and Hogan, M.D stated in their research that screen media could help
children learn numbers and letters, teach them empathy, show them different
cultural perspectives, and other interpersonal skills. Likewise, social networking
sites (Facebook, Twitter, Google +, Snapchat, etc.) were places for making
new friends and meeting the old ones across the country. Also, YouTube media
and text messenger could send children positive messages. So to speak,
“age-appropriate” and “educational” media is able to help children more literate,
teach them specific skills and strategies.
In contrast, Heather
L. Kirkorian et al., who are
professors at the University of Massachusetts–Amherst and the University of
California-Riverside, warned that children with even a small dose of exposure
to television before age three were associated to later decreasing academic
performances. Furthermore, “Experiments on learning from video have repeatedly
found that infants and toddlers learn better from real-life experiences than
from video,” they added (Kirkorian et al. 5). Children are far more in need of
playing than for media viewing. Playing is essential for them. In the article
“Why is Play Important? Social and Emotional Development, Physical Development,
Creative Development”, the authors stated that playing together builds up
critical developments in children. They are social and emotional development, physical
and creative development. Playing encourages children to interact with their
peers, to practice language, and to learn imperative social skills, such as regulate
emotions, take turns and sharing. In my point of view, children should not use
media for it hardly helps them but affects them adversely.
The first damaging consequence from media use is violence and
aggression. In their research, Brad J. Bushman, Ph.D. and L. Rowell
Huesmann, Ph.D. spoke out some shocking results: Violent media was a
crucial factor causing people to commit acts of violence, to be afraid of
becoming a victim of violence, and to be insensitive to the pain of the others.
These effects remained over time. This research proved that children watching violent
contents would become more aggressive adults. Especially with boys, eighteen
percent of them could possibly use knifes or guns, and significantly have
tendencies to be arrested for a crime. Excessive viewers who exposed to media
at least four hours per day was more fearful of being victims of violence. They
probably wouldn’t believe in the others and perceive their surroundings as dangerous
places. This fear could develop early in childhood. They might gradually become
more indifferent to the pain and suffering of others, and show less sympathy to
victims of violence. The authors also explained that those affected viewers
were less willing to help victims of violence, for they thought the victim’s
injuries were not that bad, as they held aggressors’ perspective.
Violence media, such as video games are rotting our children’s
brains. Because children and adolescents watch daily predominant television
programs which “sixty-one percent of the shows containing violence of some
kinds” (Agarwal and Dhanasekaran 2), it is difficult for them to avoid these
unhealthy impacts. If they have unlimited, unsupervised access to violence
media, without immediate instructions and explanations about those violent
acts, they gradually shape their aggressive behaviors accordingly, for children
learn by mimicking and repeating.
Second, heavy media exposure negatively affects sexual
initiations, attitudes and moral judgments in children and adolescents. Bryant
Jennings and Steven C. Rockwell, who are professors of The University of
Alabama, conducted a study in which young adolescents watched fifteen hours of
sexual contents depicting unmarried people. Later these subjects considered such
situation as less morally wrong. And they became more approving of sexual
adulteries or improprieties. This study indicated that young teenagers, who
exposed to screen media portraying sexual intimacy between unmarried
individuals, could result in changing moral judgment. Also, Keren
Eyal and Dale Kunkel, Ph.D., who are interested in media content and
effects on children, also confirmed the finding of Jennings and Rockwell that
exposure to sexual content could influence young adults’ sexual attitudes and
moral judgments. Their study revealed two other aspects: first, the portrayal
of negative consequences of sex could affect more negative attitudes about and
perceptions of sexual activity; and second, viewing negative outcome leads to
significantly more negative moral judgment of characters. Moreover, the result
indicated that such effects could persist over a two-week period. They said young
adults who watched negative consequences would be less likely to imitate the
behavior, in order to avoid suffering consequences similar to those experienced
by the characters. Whereas, there was not a significant change in attitude or
moral judgment of participants in positive consequence condition. This was
possible for well-established effects on participants. Since they had daily
watched such predominated positive outcomes on television, the pretest shown
their positive attitudes and moral judgments.
As reported by Agarwal and Dhanasekaran, professors at the
King George's Medical University, “fifty percent of shows and sixty-six percent
of prime time shows contain sexual content, only nine percent contain any
reference to possible risk or responsibilities of sexual activity or any
reference to contraception or safer sex” (2). Many other sources of media with
improper contents could be problematic, for adolescents curiously explore sex
by all means. By any change children and adolescents become decision-makers of
what to see. It is because they have more freedom with television, laptop,
smartphone and notepad in their bedrooms, and the parents are engaged with
their own business. Besides, there is a lack of effective sex education at home
and school. Teachers and parents should be aware that children are exposed to
sexual imagery and sexual contents at their early age, so we’d better teach and
instruct them at the right time.
At last, children’s health is deleteriously affected by media
use. In The Journal of the American Medical Association, Anders Grontved,
researcher at the University of Southern Denmark, and Frank B. Hu, professor at
the Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, used a meta-analysis to
examine the association between television viewing habits and risks of health
problems. According to their data, every year in the US, with
one-hundred-thousand individuals, for every two hours of television viewing per
day, the most recent type-II diabetes statistic were one-hundred-seventy-six
cases. American Heart Association cardiovascular disease mortality rate
statistics were estimated to be thirty-eight cases. The most recent mortality
rate statistics were one-hundred-and four deaths.
Leonard A. Jason, Ph.D., et al. did a specific study on
children’s health and media use. They suggested that excessive media exposure
was linked to the rise of childhood obesity which increasingly related to
hypertension, asthma, type-II diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Children
snack more with fatty and salty food. Their demands of junk foods increase as
the result of children-targeted advertisements. The authors used Kaiser Family
Foundation’s data to show that children watched approximately forty-thousand
advertisements on television per year. Among those advertisements, thirty-two
percent featured candy, thirty-one percent featured cereal, and nine percent
featured fast food. No surprise that the fast food industry would spend
three-billion dollars for only children-targeted advertisements every year. In
sum, media is doing more harms than goods for children and adolescents.
According to Bushman and Huesmann, some people don’t agree
with the harmful impacts. First, they might not think about the worst thing
which rarely happens, like murder, could exist in their own lives. For them,
these rare cases are once in a while, and not everyone watches violent media,
then kill people. Second, they might accept negative influences on some others,
but not themselves. Third, many people are so strongly convinced by attractive
media marketing that they don’t recognize media’s side effects. And finally,
people might not understand psychological processes as well as they understand
physical processes. So they wouldn’t aware of the mental influences as fast as
the physical influences.
The fact that children are the most affected concerns us.
Unfortunately, some parents happen to let their children have unacceptable
television viewing habits. In the study “Television Viewing and Televisions in
Bedrooms: Perceptions of Racial/Ethnic Minority Parents of Young Children”, the
authors, who are experts in children and family relations, nutrition and
healthcare, have found that racial/ethnic minority parents let their children
use television for the following reasons: to keep children occupied safely and
quietly when they are busy, to get children to fall asleep, or to have their
own private time. The authors figured that parents neither were concerned about
the amount of television their children were viewing, nor aware of the adverse
consequences associated with having televisions in children bedrooms. Not all
parents acknowledge the ugly side of media use. They don’t set any limitations
or monitor the contents, thus they can’t prevent their children and adolescents
from harmful influences.
Concerning to children’s well-being, Bryant and Rockwell
suggested that there were three important factors a family should employ:
having clearly and well-defined family value system in which children can know
and use media products; having free and open discussions of issues; and
encouraging active critical viewings. Moreover, Kirkorian, et al.
recommended parents should become active co-viewer and moderator; media
producers should integrate narrative and educational contents as much as
possible. Strasburger, M.D and Hogan, M.D had some recommendations: First,
pediatricians and healthcare providers should ask questions about media use
history, particularly children with obesity, aggressive behaviors, difficulties
at school, or who are overweight, and provide counseling for families at every
well-child visit. Second, schools should be well educated about risks
correlated with unsupervised and unlimited media use, foster the benefits of
media use and encourage innovations, cooperate with parents and teachers to
apply rules and instruct children to use media appropriately. Third,
entertainment industry should maximize prosocial contents and lessen harmful
effects, also adjust marketing activities with health concerns. And at last,
federal government should advocate for researches on the impacts of media, issue
strong regulations, work with Department of Education to utilize the benefits
of media use in curriculums.
In conclusion, practical researches have consistently
proved that even though media use could be a good friend, it could become a
trouble-maker. Its harmful influences on children and adolescent would be violence
and aggression, sexual matters and health problems. However, they can be
avoidable with moderations, instructions and explanations. Therefore, we should
immediately take actions to protect our offspring. As parents, we could become
co-viewers and moderators. As teachers, we could become instructors. As
healthcare providers, we could become counselors. As smart media users, we
could set limitations for ourselves, and so on. We would do everything to raise
our children physically and mentally healthy.